nav-left cat-right

What India’s Solar Tariff Exemption Could Mean for the US Market

What India’s Solar Tariff Exemption Could Mean for the US Market

New documents show that a few countries with significant solar manufacturing facilities are exempt from Trump’s new solar tariffs, which could help U.S. developers.

The exemption could be meaningful for Adani, the largest cell and module manufacturer in India.

The market impact from new solar tariffs announced earlier this week is shaping up to be less severe than it could have been. But while analysts don’t expect solar cell and module prices to skyrocket, some big business decisions will be made in the coming weeks and months around the modest price increase — which has prompted a series of questions around how, exactly, the new tariffs will be implemented.

One of the interesting pieces of information revealed in trade documents obtained by GTM this week is that crystalline silicon solar products from India are not subject to the new tariffs.

Annex I of President Trump’s proclamation confirms India is on the list of Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) beneficiary countries, which are exempt from import tariffs because they currently account for a small portion of U.S. solar imports. This is significant for the manufacturers operating in India — and there are several notable ones — and for U.S. solar project developers looking to procure tariff-free panels.

But there’s a catch.

Imports from GSP countries are limited to 3 percent of U.S. crystalline silicon solar (CSPV) imports per country and 9 percent total for all exempt countries. Furthermore, it’s unclear what the 3 and 9 percent figures are based on. The reference period for those import quantities has not yet been determined.

Let’s assume for a moment that it’s 3 percent of the 10.2 gigawatts of crystalline silicon solar modules imported in 2017, as per the U.S. International Trade Commission’s pre-hearing staff report (note: that number is likely incomplete because it’s based on a survey of companies that made up 80 percent of imports in 2016)Using the 10.2-gigawatt figure, the tariff-free amount per GSP country would equate to around 300 megawatts.

Looking across GSP countries, collective imports totaled less than 1 percent in 2017, coming in well under the 9 percent cap. That would allow for a total of around 800 megawatts of tariff-exempt solar products — again, assuming 10.2 gigawatts is the benchmark.

According to GTM Research data, India was responsible for around 0.08 percent of solar products imported into U.S. in 2016, and was likely around 0.1 percent of imports in 2017. That means solar imports from India could swell to 2.9 percent in 2018, or nearly 300 megawatts based on the calculation above.

This could represent a meaningful opportunity for Adani, which currently operates a 1.2-gigawatt cell and module manufacturing plant in India, making it the largest tariff-free CSPV manufacturer in the world. Tata Power Solar and Vikram Solar are also in a position to boost their exports to the U.S. Chinese-owned manufacturers operating in India, including Longi, Hareon Solar and GCL-Poly could get in on the action, too — although the status of their India-based factories is not well known.

“There’s definitely growth in the solar manufacturing market in India, and there’s definitely capacity that can be shipped to the U.S. that has already gone through the natural barrier of shipping to the U.S.,” said Jade Jones, senior analyst at GTM Research. “These producers have been proven bankable by going through the U.S.-required testing standards and already have some presence in the U.S. market.”

“I definitely expect some installers to take advantage of Indian supply,” she added.

Excerpt from Annex I

Turkey is another notable GSP country. Csun, Hanwha and HT-SAAE all have facilities there that are forecast to reach a total of 1.6 gigawatts of module supply and 1 gigawatt of cell supply in 2018. Those facilities were initially set up to serve the European market, said Jones, but these suppliers may decide to take advantage of the U.S. market opportunity.

Brazil is also on the GSP list and has around 1.4 gigawatts of CSPV module manufacturing capacity. But it’s unlikely to play a major role in the U.S. because Brazil’s domestic content is needed for development bank financing, according to Jones.

The tricky thing about taking advantage of the GSP country carve-out is that once the 3 or 9 percent threshold is hit, the president has the authority to slap on tariffs, as per the proclamation he signed earlier in the week. And it’s not entirely clear how the tariffs will be applied.

There could be a snapback provision, where tariffs are applied immediately as soon as the import limit is reached — meaning U.S. Customs and Border Protection would have the ability to enact tariffs in real time. But sources say it’s more likely the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) will have to get involved in order to change the rules for an exempt country.

According to trade lawyers, one approach would be for the USTR to assess import data on a rolling basis, say, quarterly or biannually, and calculate each country’s share of imports over that period of time. So if India were to exceed the 3 percent limit for the reference period — which, again, has yet to be determined — in the second quarter of 2018, in this scenario it could take the USTR until the end of the year to complete its calculations for that quarter, and it could take several more months to change the rules so that India is no longer exempt. Theoretically, India-based module producers could continue to import tariff-free all the while, despite having technically passed the threshold.

But then there’s a question of whether tariffs are applied to overages retroactively, or only to imported products going forward. Exempt solar manufacturers will be hesitant to take ambitious action if they believe they could be penalized later on.

It’s a tricky position to be in, especially since the 3 and 9 percent limits are likely to be assessed on a first-come, first-served basis, according to one trade lawyer. So companies with available module capacity are incentivized to act quickly to take advantage of the GSP opportunity.

The same could be true for cell manufacturers. The Section 201 solar decision allows for 2.5 gigawatts of solar cells to be imported each year of the four-year tariff period. The USTR has yet to confirm if or how that amount will be allocated. If there are no country-based allocations, it will become a race-to-the-port scenario.

Additional information should become available in the coming days, with the tariffs scheduled to take effect on February 7. On February 22, the USTR will release the rules for companies seeking exemptions from the tariffs. The possibility of an exemption is particularly significant for San Jose-based SunPower, which announced this week it is canceling $20 million in investment as a result of the tariffs.

Amid all of the uncertainty and planning, many solar companies affected by the tariffs — both in the U.S. and abroad — are hoping there will be a successful challenge to the tariffs at the World Trade Organization. If the WTO authorizes members to implement retaliatory measures, the U.S. solar tariffs could quickly disappear. While the WTO process typically takes 12 to 18 months, no global safeguard measure has escaped WTO condemnation in the past.

 The exemption could be meaningful for Adani, the largest cell and module manufacturer in India.
The exemption could be meaningful for Adani, the largest cell and module manufacturer in India.


SOURCE:  GreenTech Media

BY:  Julia Pyper Senior Editor
Greentech Media

Julia Pyper is a Senior Editor at Greentech Media covering clean energy policy, the solar industry, grid edge technologies and electric mobility. She previously reported for E&E Publishing, and has covered clean energy and climate change issues across the U.S. and abroad, including in Haiti, Israel and the Maldives. Julia holds degrees from McGill and Columbia Universities. Find her on Twitter @JMPyper.




Could Backlash to Trump’s Solar Tariff Be Good News for India?

India’s PV import tariff proposal contradicts Modi’s call for free trade.

India's solar industry is facing steep tariffs. Developers hope Modi's pushback against Trump is a sign he'll abandon them.

India’s solar industry is facing steep tariffs. Developers hope Modi’s pushback against Trump is a sign he’ll abandon them.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi slammed Trump’s protectionist policies this week, after the White House slapped 30 percent tariffs on imported solar cells and modules.

Solar developers in India hope that Modi’s embrace of free trade means he’ll strike down proposed Indian tariffs that could stunt the country’s PV market.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum, Modi labeled protectionism as one of the world’s three biggest threats. But his government is also considering a solar import tariff more than twice as high as the one announced by the White House on Monday.

Analysts predict India’s fast-growing solar sector could be hobbled by a 70 percent safeguard duty suggested earlier this month by the director general of safeguards to protect Indian PV manufacturers from Chinese competitors.

Indian solar analysis firm Bridge to India said the rooftop solar sector could see volumes declining by up to 50 percent if anything over a 20 percent duty were to be introduced.

Large-scale PV projects, meanwhile, would increase in price by up to 35 percent, which could dissuade distribution companies (known as discoms in India) from tendering for solar.

“The discoms are obviously not keen on tariffs going up substantially from current levels, creating uncertainty for all new tenders,” said Bridge to India’s Vinay Rustagi in a blog post.

Rishab Shrestha, an analyst with GTM Research, said that even if Indian PV manufacturers favored a tariff, they lacked the capacity to serve India’s galloping solar sector.

At the end of last July, India had enough domestic manufacturing capacity to produce 3.1 gigawatts of cells and 8.8 gigawatts of modules a year, he said, although the actual amount being used was closer to 1.5 gigawatts of cells and up to 3 gigawatts of modules.

“It wouldn’t be possible, with that domestic capacity, to cater to around 10+ gigawatts per year,” which is roughly the size of the PV market in India today, said Shrestha.

“I think the rate is very high for the proposal to go through,” he commented. “It’s hard to imagine that the Modi government would want to jeopardize its ambitious solar plans. Discoms had already pushed back on power-purchase agreements for lower tariffs last year.”

For now, the safeguard duty proposal is on hold following a petition by Shapoorji Pallonji Infrastructure, a solar plant contractor and developer, through the Madras High Court.

Shapoorji Pallonji Infrastructure claimed the director general of safeguards had given stakeholders 30 days to respond to an inquiry initiated on behalf of the Indian Solar Manufacturers Association, but then rushed a proposal out without waiting for the deadline.

The Independent Solar Power Producers Alliance, an industry group, has also filed a petition through the Delhi High Court, asking for a stay on the director general’s recommendation, The Economic Times of India reported.

The court actions mean uncertainty over the fate of Indian solar market could drag out over “a few months,” Bridge to India said. “We expect an eventful year ahead, dogged by uncertainty, disputes and litigation.”

The analyst firm claimed to see “many developers and contractors slowing execution, as even a marginal duty imposition will make many projects unviable.”

It was against this backdrop that Modi took to the stage this week at Davos and issued an impassioned plea for free trade that many saw as a thinly veiled attack on American protectionist measures, most recently exemplified by a tariff on imported solar cells and modules.

“Modi, making the forum’s first speech by an Indian head of state in more than two decades, did not mention Trump by name but he criticized the rise of protectionism in remarks delivered three days before the U.S. president will address the summit,” Reuters said.

In an analysis released this week, GTM Research concluded that the 30 percent import tariff issued by the Trump administration could cut U.S. solar installations by 11 percent over the next five years.

“This represents a reduction of 7.6 gigawatts of installed solar PV capacity between 2018 and 2022,” according to GTM Research.

India’s solar developers are hoping Modi’s free-market stance at Davos can help the Indian market avoid a similar fate.

Join us for the 11th annual Solar Summit 2018 in San Diego, May 1-2. Powered by the unique blend of research and economic analysis from the GTM Research team, this year’s agenda will feature themes from beyond traditional project finance to innovations in solar and the transformation of electricity.

 LINK:  read:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *